Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Keagan's avatar

This was an interesting read Trinsy, the report was succinct and insightful. While I agree that WSC’s innovation and efficient business model allows them to lead the North American modular workspace solutions and portable storage solutions, I am not completely convinced whether they would be able to continue dominating these markets over the long term as I do not find WSC’s moat to be deep. The unit economics of WSC compared to its peers are impressive. However, it can be easily replicated by competitors like MGRC given enough time after their current units – which lifespans are significantly shorter than WSC’s units – become obsolete. Furthermore, the VAPS are not a unique product offering and are also provided by competitors.

Even though WSC acts as a one-stop solution, it does not make them stand out greatly from competitors as they also provide multiple solutions, albeit not as many as WSC. I think it would be useful to delve deeper into its competitive advantages and see how WSC is able to set themselves apart from their competitors. For example, comparing prices between similar product offerings or the average time taken to set up a space.

With all these being said, I agree that the scale of WSC is a key competitive advantage. MGRC having a fleet size 5x smaller but still being their closest competitor emphasizes WSC’s ability to serve their customers more efficiently than their competitors. I also think your 3 and 5 year targets are achievable as WSC's competitors are not likely to be able to catch up within this timeframe.

I’d like to know your thoughts on how WSC is undervalued, I took a quick look at WSC’s competitors (MGRC, URI, and ACO.X) and noticed that they had drastically lower LTM P/E (12.5x, 16.14x, and 13.75x respectively) compared to WSC’s LTM P/E of 259x. What is your opinion on whether WSC will still be able to lead the modular workspace solutions and portable storage solutions after 10+ years?

Expand full comment
Jo Vial's avatar

Thanks for the write-up Trinsy! Found it interesting that you delved into this area, and the consolidation story is also very interesting as well.

1. The management comments indicate that its economic moat precisely exists in that new customers will choose the most reputable and known company in this area, and I do not presume to know which companies are most well-known in this area. But to my knowledge, this is not a household name that will come to mind, and that would mean that when people try to search up temporary space solutions areas, they would rather do a Google search. Shouldn’t the company be focusing on SEO based outcomes, or am I missing something in how the company acquires new customers?

2. If scale is an advantage in this place, and with having a Single-Point of Contact as an investment thesis, you expect WSC to continue acquiring small players that lack access to similar offerings to expand the customer base. However, with quick market consolidation already happening among all players, would this mean

a. that small players would all be sold at premiums and each big player would pay an increasingly larger price to attain these smaller businesses, and;

b. with larger FTC scrutiny existing in this space, that would mean that larger, more aggressive competitors such as McGrath would quickly sprout up with no fear of being acquired by WSC. This would necessarily erode the economic moat that WSC would now have in time.

3. Since a trump victory has occurred, and market looking more conducive than ever for deal making, could WSC be thinking of acquiring McGrath again? Would the share price then fall as a result and would this risk be more present than ever going into 2025?

4. Stock is down since you first covered this, due to EPS miss by -0.08 in Q3 24. Do you foresee any catalysts other than earnings revisions (MS upgraded from 40 to 50 but stock still fell) or earnings results?

5. You also mentioned that McGrath is WSC’s closest competitor. Can I ask why the larger player URI is not as close a competitor as McGrath?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts